Taxation of Mining and Petroleum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/alr623Keywords:
Energy Law, Petroleum LawAbstract
The following article discusses various types of business arrangements, such as farmouts, participation agreements, operating agreements, joint ventures, etc., which are frequently used in the natural resources extraction industry. The article then discusses section 66 of the Income Tax Act, and in particular, through a review of case law, legal writings and legislative enactments, the author defines and suggests the proper interpretation of the words "association", "partnership" and "syndicate" which, although used in the Act, are not defined. The author then outlines five significant tax provisions which result from the new partnership tax proposals in the Income Tax Act, and which must be of concern to every business which is involved in the area of natural resource extraction. How to determine whether or not a certain business relationship is a partnership, and the consequent applicability or non-applicability of the new partnership taxing provisions, is outlined and examined. The author suggests, however, that in all likelihood the new partnership taxation provisions would only be applied to the clear-cut cases of partnerships and would not be applied to the various types of business arrangements referred to above. In his concluding comments, the author discusses certain election provisions in the Internal Revenue Code of the United States; encourages the government to specifically exclude the normal extractive industry relationships from taxation as partnerships; and discusses the effect of the new tax provisions in relation to the problem of obtaining American capital.Downloads
Issue
Section
License
For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.