Prior Occupation and Schismatic Principles: Toward a Normative Theorization of Aboriginal Title

Authors

  • Dwight G. Newman University of Saskatchewan College of Law.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/alr370

Abstract

There are two divergent principles underlying the

constitutional recognition of Aboriginal title in s. 35(1) of the <i>Constitution Act, 1982</i> the historically-oriented principle of "prior occupation, " and the forward-looking principle of "reconciliation. " A closer look at the principle of "prior occupation " reveals several possible rationales behind its requirement in the test for Aboriginal title: to promote economic efficiency; to ground a natural right of ownership; and to function as a proxy for the protection of individual or group identity.  However, each of these rationales fails to adequately respond to both previous jurisprudence in the area and the need to achieve a just and legally sound system for determining future claims. If "prior occupation" is instead understood as a proxy for "community connections to land," then the primary interests at stake are more clearly revealed. It is then possible to develop a principled and more consistent way of dealing with Aboriginal title claims in a way that respects the interests of all involved.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-30

Issue

Vol 44, No 4

Section

Articles

License

For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License

For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:

  1. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
  2. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
  3. Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
  4. Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.

To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.