Who Can Be Examined for Discovery: The Evolution of Rule 200(1) and its Application Under the Proposed Rules of Court

Authors

  • Thomas H. Ferguson, Q.C. Counsel, Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, Calgary.
  • Douglas T. Yoshida Partner, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, Calgary.
  • Kirsten A. Thoreson Associate, Bennett Jones LLP, Toronto.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/alr309

Abstract

This article examines the evolution of r. 200(1) of the Alberta Rules of Court, beginning with the first formulation of r. 200(1) in the 1914 Alberta Rules of Court and culminating in its draft form in the Alberta Rules of Court: Test Draft 3. Rule 200(1) allows a party to examine for discovery the employees, former employees, and corporate representative of an opposing party in such circumstances where they have knowledge of the issues between the parties by nature of their employment, without obtaining an order to do so. This article focuses on the present application and interpretation of r. 200(1) by examining the impact of two critical cases on the Rule. Then, the authors undertake a comparison of the present form of the Rule and the new form it will take under the Proposed Alberta Rules of Court. The authors conclude that the proposed Rule contradicts the broad and purposive approach that has been taken to the present Rule by reinstating an additional "best informed" test and adding three additional criteria.

Downloads

Issue

Vol 45, No 4

Section

Articles

License

For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License

For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:

  1. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
  2. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
  3. Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
  4. Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.

To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.