The Extinguishment of Aboriginal Rights and the James Bay Agreement: The Condition 14 Test
Abstract
In 1977, an Act of the Parliament of Canada approved the James Bay and Northern Québec Agreement signed by the Crown and the Cree and the Inuit of Quebec. The Act purported to extinguish the Aboriginal title and interests of “all Indians and all Inuit” in and to the territory covered by the Agreement, thus extending the extinguishment clause to the land claims of Aboriginal peoples that were not parties to the Agreement. This purported unilateral extinguishment clause was met with immediate resistance from various non-signatory Indigenous groups who claimed that they were not properly consulted and that their Aboriginal title was unjustly extinguished. This article examines the validity of this claim, particularly whether, prior to the enactment of section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, there were any constitutional constraints on Parliament’s ability to unilaterally extinguish the rights of Indigenous peoples. The article argues that the 1870 Order in Council admitting Rupert’s Land into Canada, in particular Condition 14 of the Order, provides such constraints and thus precludes the unilateral extinguishment of the Aboriginal title of the non-signatory people. This article ultimately calls for negotiation and reconciliation among all parties involved in order to resolve the outstanding land claims and ensure the equitable recognition of Aboriginal rights.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.