Manitoba Metis Federation Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General): Breathing New Life into the "Empty Box" Doctrine of "Indian Title"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/alr27Abstract
This article addresses the Supreme Court’s recent decision in <i>Manitoba Metis Federation v. Canada (Attorney General)</i>, the Court’s interpretation of section 31 of the <i>Manitoba Act, 1870</i>, and the ways in which the ruling seems guided by, or at least concurs with, the works and opinions of Thomas Flanagan. The author highlights various cases which have dealt with Métis rights, established canons of statutory interpretation, Crown obligations, opposing scholarly views, and the distinction between historical contextual analysis and historical legal analysis. In doing so, the author argues that the decision is essentially an invocation and resuscitation of the “empty box” doctrine. This doctrine serves both to recognize Métis rights and revoke them of any tangible substance that such recognition might bring, and seemingly obfuscates the plain meaning rule of interpretation applied to the section 31 phrase: “towards the extinguishment of the Indian Title.”Downloads
Issue
Section
Articles
License
For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.
