The Real Laws of the Constitution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/alr1607Abstract
Legal doctrine alone is rarely determinative of the outcome in constitutional adjudication. Recalling the hypotheses of the legal realist movement, the author some of the non-doctrinal factors that may be at work in judicial decision-making. The author calls for greater judicial frankness when invoking such non- doctrinal factors and for assistance from the academic community in order to help identify those factors. In the result, it is hoped that those factors which judges are ill- equipped to consider be isolated and, if need be, reposed in other, more suitable, bodies by the legislatures.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.
