Ecological Unity and Political Fragmentation: The Implications of the Brundtland Report for the Canadian Constitutional Order
AbstractUsing the recommendations of the Brundtland Report and the "Green Report" of the Canadian Council of Resource and Environment Ministers as a basis for analysis, the author discusses Canadian environmental policy and natural resources management within a constitutional setting. The author asserts that by failing to expressly address the constitutional implications that these issues raise, namely, that the natural environment must be conceptualized as a cohesive unity which renders political boundaries mere legal fictions, the approach to date has been fundamentally flawed. Part One of the paper sets out the principles of sustainable development and the constitutional questions they raise for Canadian resource management and Canadian federalism. Part Two then examines the "spillover" theory of democracy and federalism and its relationship to the "Peace, Order and Good Government" clause. The author concludes that a formalistic Constitutional framework can never provide a practical solution to the problem — environmental management and resource management are indivisible and should be addressed through cooperative federalism. Finally, the author suggests that the Constitution may be able to play a constructive role by defining the parameters within which cooperative federalism must occur
For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.