Standing Up for Notwithstanding

Authors

  • Peter H. Russell

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/alr1563

Abstract

The author responds to and criticizes the attack of Professor John Whyte on the notwithstanding clause in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. After quickly dealing with several of the admittedly bad reasons for inclusion of the notwithstanding clause, the author puts forward his case for the override focusing on the substantive outcomes of decision-making, as well as the process of decision-making itself. The author supports his views by considering two test cases: The Elections Act Case and The Quebec Signs Case. Finally, the author takes issue with White's treatment of Canada's basic constitutional principles and their bearing on the override issue. The author concludes that it would not be sound to let all public issues which may be adjudicated under the Charter fall to be settled by judges, and he then uses this conclusion to refute the arguments put forward by Professor conclusion Whyte

Downloads

Published

1991-02-01

Issue

Vol 29, No 2

Section

Articles

License

For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License

For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:

  1. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
  2. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
  3. Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
  4. Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.

To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.