Does the Charter Mandate One Person, One Vote
AbstractSince the inception of the Constitution Act, 1982, a myriad of issues and challenges have been evolving, one of which has been the recent "one person, one vote" challenges to the existing electoral distribution laws. This paper presents background evidence prepared for the recent legal challenge to Alberta's electoral law, and entered into evidence in the Supreme Court's consideration of Saskatchewan's law. Together with the accompanying response by Allan Tupper, which also arises out of the Alberta litigation, it makes more widely available the full scope of the debate our courts were asked to arbitrate. The authors explore the policies which shaped the principles embodied in the electoral distribution laws existing in Canada today. They compare the Canadian situation to both the British and the American experiences. The authors then discuss factors inherent in Canadian society, such as the Crown, bicameralism, federalism, Constitutional supremacy, and the Charter, which tend towards rejection of the "pure democratic" model. They conclude that the Charter does not prevent legislatures from relying on non-population factors to protect "communities of interest" in constructing electoral systems. The Charter does not, in short, mandate "one person, one vote."
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.