The Crisis of Constitutional Literalism in Australia

Authors

  • Greg Craven

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/alr1521

Abstract

The article acts as an introduction to current Australian debates concerning constitutional interpretation. Since the 1920s, the dominant interpretive scheme has been "literalism." Under this theory, the High Court has concerned itself with finding meaning exclusively within the written text. This highly technical approach to constitutional interpretation has masked a political agenda of centralising power into the hands of the federal government. For this and other reasons, literalism is losing favour in Australia and several other interpretive strategies are being advanced. The article concludes by summarising the challengers to literalism, analyzing their merits and weaknesses, and suggesting a synthesis.

Downloads

Published

1992-02-01

Issue

Vol 30, No 2: Centre for Constitutional Studies

Section

Articles

License

For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License

For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:

  1. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
  2. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
  3. Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
  4. Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.

To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.