The Receipt-Based Constructive Trust: A Case Study of Personal and Proprietary Restitution in the Supreme Court
AbstractThis article analyzes the Supreme Court of Canada’s treatment of the receipt-based constructive trust in the companion cases of Gold v. Rosenberg and Citadel General Assurance Co. v. Lloyds Bank Canada. The author discusses the liability of those who participate in a breach of fiduciary duty to be held accountable as constructive trustees. He criticizes the Supreme Court’s decisions for being too equitable and, while correctly characterizing equitable recipient liability as restitutionary, for failing to adhere sufficiently to restitutionary principles in their reasoning. In addition, the author discusses different approaches used by the courts in determining the degree of knowledge necessary to hold a recipient of property liable as a constructive trustee. Ultimately, this article determines the Supreme Court’s failure to understand the juristic nature of the receipt-based constructive trust results in continued confusion in the treatment of the constructive trust.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.