Trademark.com: Trademark Law in Cyberspace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/alr1453Abstract
his article examines the current issues in trademark law surrounding internet domain names. The author introduces the topic with a detailed explanation of the use and purpose of domain names, the significance of the various levels in domain names and how domain names compare and contract mth IP addresses. Of significant difference is the use of words and names in domain names. Organizations often use recognizable and familiar names to improve the chance Internet users will access their websites. Trademark issues are sparked by the battle to obtain and/or retain these highly sought after domain names. The author discusses the areas of conflict when: I) a domain name is registered by an individual who has no connection with the mark, 2) two or more organizations have claims to the same domain name, 3) one domain name is confusingly similar to another, and 4) when second level domain names can be assigned to multiple first level domain names. Two essential legal issues are identified: whether domain names are protectable as trademarks and whether a domain name can violate a trademark. Courts have used the analogy of telephone mnemonics to help answer these issues in favour of recognizing mnemonics as a protectable trademark, although there is split authority on how much protection can be given to domain names that incorporate generic terms. Trends in litigation in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom are discussed. Despite the de facto judicial power given to NSIfor dispute resolution, the author identifies fundamental flaws of the NSI policy owing the current controversies over Internet domain names. The article concludes with a discussion of several major proposals to implement changes regarding domain names allocation.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.