In Search of the Qualitative Clear Majority: Democratic Experimentalism and the Quebec Secession Reference
AbstractThis article attempts to marry direct democratic deliberation with the enforcement of important constitutional norms in the context of a real-life policy question. The question is the secession of Quebec. The author argues that a referendum is neither the most legitimate nor the most effective way to address the issue. The debate over Quebec's future needs to be reoriented by reference to the broad normative framework set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Secession Reference, combined with a renewed democratic process. The author introduces an innovative non-Canadian constitutional model called "democratic experimentalism," which seeks to ensure legitimacy, participation, and accountability within heterogeneous, complex democratic systems as a fresh perspective on Canada's troubled federalism debate. The author concludes that democratic experimentalism is compatible with Canada's constitutional values and traditions, and with the standard of the "clear qualitative majority" vote set down by the Supreme Court of Canada. Equally, the Secession Reference approach contains within it an important new understanding of how pluralist democracies globally should approach fundamental constitutional questions.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.