The Complaint Resolution Project
AbstractThe authors describe the new complaint resolution project at the Law Society of Alberta, which handles some of the client/lawyer and lawyer/lawyer complaints. Because the legal profession is self-governing, the Law Society must have a means of protecting the public and regulating the conduct of its members. Under the Legal Profession Act, a process is in place that deals with written complaints in a very formal manner. The shortfalls of this formal process are the high levels of stress for the participants, the time required and the expense involved. The authors recognize, however, that the less formal process discussed is only appropriate in some, and not all, cases. This less formal process was tested during the Trial Project. The complaints officers offered complainants the less formal route when it was felt to be appropriate. The dispute resolution process that has emerged is neither traditional arbitration nor mediation, but rather a hybrid process, in which the complaints officer inserts himself or herself between the parties, and attempts to assist in reaching a settlement. The authors discuss common causes and types of complaints and then present the results of the Trial Project. While it is perhaps too early for a definitive statistical assessment, it seems that the Trial Project has significantly reduced the number of formal complaints being dealt with by the Law Society. Additionally, the project seems to have been well received by the bar. At the same time, the authors want to remain open to criticism and discuss some concerns that have been voiced about the new process and the complaints officers. The authors then canvass informal complaints procedures that have been instituted by other law societies, Canadian and otherwise, and compare the experiences and results of those projects. In conclusion, the authors recount the overall favourable comments they have received as part of the Trial Project, and discuss the challenge for the Law Society in the f
For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.