Unsolicited Bids for Government Functions

Authors

  • Nolan Bederman
  • Michael Trebilock

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/alr1038

Abstract

This article develops the case for designing a process to encourage and evaluate unsolicited bids for privatization or contracting out of government functions. The authors argue that conventional government procurement practices are unlikely to uncover or reveal all potentially desirable opportunities for privatization or contracting out, given informational constraints, search costs, and bureaucratic and political disincentives operating on public sector agents. Thus, there is a strong case for reversing the burden of initiative with respect to alternative modes of delivery of public goods or services. The article develops a private sector analogy for unsolicited bids for government functions

Downloads

Issue

Vol 35, No 4

Section

Articles

License

For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License

For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:

  1. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
  2. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
  3. Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
  4. Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.

To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.