Canada (A.G.) v. PHS Community Services Society — The Insite Decision
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/alr275Abstract
On 30 September 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered a judgment that granted a new lease on life to Vancouver’s Insite, North America’s first, and still only, supervised safe drug injection facility. The unanimous decision on important issues of constitutional law resolved an unseemly federal-provincial squabble over drug addiction treatment policy and arguably paved the way for a more liberal approach to a problem that has plagued Canada’s inner cities for decades. The Court’s analysis of traditional principles surrounding the division of powers and the application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to governmental action will undoubtedly provide some future guidance to lawyers and judges as they wrestle with other cases where issues of morality and law may intersect.Downloads
Issue
Section
License
For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.