Rights of First Refusal in Oil and Gas Transactions: A Progressive Analysis

Authors

  • Clifford D. Johnson
  • David J. Stanford

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/alr525

Keywords:

Energy Law, Petroleum Law

Abstract

This article begins the analysis of rights of first refusal ("ROFR") by providing an historical of how they have been treated and interpreted by the courts. The analysis continues with an examination of the methods of identifying ROFRs, such as an offer to purchase or a bona fide intention by a party to dispose of its working interest. The authors provide a discussion of the ROFR Notice, discuss package sales and unmatchable consideration, and provide remedies available to a ROFR holder. Throughout the analysis, the authors underscore the importance of drafting proper ROFR clauses at the outset to avoid reasonably foreseeable problems arising later. The authors conclude by drawing implications for the owners of oil and gas properties subject to based on the foregoing analysis and provide commentary on the application of ROFRs.

Downloads

Issue

Vol 37, No 2: Petroleum Law Edition

Section

Articles

License

For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License

For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:

  1. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
  2. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
  3. Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
  4. Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.

To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.