The Primacy of Expectancy in Estoppel Remedies: An Historical and Empirical Analysis
AbstractThis article explores the historical origins and development of estoppel remedies from the early English courts to the modern application of estoppel principles in Canada. The author characterizes different types of estoppel, noting their doctrinal similarities and differences. The author pays particular attention to the reasoning the courts rely on when applying an estoppel remedy and concludes that an estoppel remedy is most likely to correspond to the expectancy of the representee. Hence, expectancy, also understood as the reasonable expectations engendered in the representee through the representations made by the representor, is the foremost basis for estoppel remedies. The author includes extensive appendices, as a record of his empirical study testing the remedial basis of estoppel, which cite recorded Canadian appellate estoppel cases, subdividing this data into: (1) successful estoppel cases; (2) unsuccessful estoppel cases; and (3) irrelevant estoppel cases.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.