Through the Admissibility of Evidence Maze: An Attempt at a Purposive Structuring
AbstractThe purposes served by admissibility rules are crucial to an understanding and evaluation of them. They are similarly central to any attempt to structure those rules. In this article the author submits that courts are moving towards a purposive structuring of admissibility of evidence. An important aspect of this movement appears to be increased reliance on balancing probative value and prejudice. Building upon this initiative, the author offers an attempt at formulating a purposive structure for admissibility rules which would be of general application to both civil and criminal proceedings.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.