Nervous Shock, Nervous Courts: The ANNS/Kamloops Test to the Rescue
AbstractThis article examines the tests employed by the courts in determining liability in tort in cases of psychiatric damage or nervous shock. The author explores the current controversy surrounding what criteria should be used in determining if and when a duty of care should be established. The article focuses on the development of an analytical framework to be used in establishing a duty of care in cases of psychiatric damage. The author begins with an examination of the development of the law in this area and how the courts in Canada are addressing the issue today. Here the author explains that Canadian courts have not adopted a uniform approach in determining issues of establishing a duty of care. The author then moves on to a discussion of the new primary/secondary victim paradigm recently developed in the United Kingdom, but argues against its incorporation as a model for Canada. Instead the author argues that the Anns/Kamloops test should be adopted as the standard test to determine issues of duty of care intort cases of psychiatric damage. In reaching this conclusion the author is supported by the approachof the courts in duty of care issues on pure economic loss cases.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.