Apportionment of Damages for Contributory Negligence: The Causal Potency Criterion
The courts in several common law jurisdictions have adopted a causal potency criterion for
the purposes of apportioning damages for contributory negligence. It has recently been
suggested that Canadian courts should follow suit. This article explores the causal potency
criterion. It is argued that the criterion has been left unexplained with the result that it is an
empty concept. Moreover, no compelling justification has been offered in support of taking
causal potency into account. Accordingly, adopting the causal potency criterion would be
a retrograde step for Canadian tort law.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.