Power and Justice: An Hypothesis in the Anthropology of Law

Authors

  • Rene R. Gadacz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/alr1708

Abstract

What characteristics of an interpersonal dispute determine the type of forum that is best suited for processing that dispute? When is a less formal approach such as mediation preferable to court action and vice-versa? Attention will be given to the disputant's justice goals. Third-party dispute forums are analyzed in terms of where power is located during all stages of the dispute resolution procedure. An hypothesis is offered which predicts that the most appropriate locus of power, be it with the disputants themselves, with a third-party such as a mediator, or with "rules" of procedure is a function of the disputant's justice goals, the relationship between the disputants, and the costs of the dispute. The hypothesis is related to three types of third-party forums — mediation, arbitration, and adjudication.

Downloads

Published

1986-01-01

Issue

Vol 24, No 2

Section

Articles

License

For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License

For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:

  1. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
  2. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
  3. Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
  4. Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.

To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.