The Crisis of Constitutional Literalism in Australia

Authors

  • Greg Craven

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/alr1521

Abstract

The article acts as an introduction to current Australian debates concerning constitutional interpretation. Since the 1920s, the dominant interpretive scheme has been "literalism." Under this theory, the High Court has concerned itself with finding meaning exclusively within the written text. This highly technical approach to constitutional interpretation has masked a political agenda of centralising power into the hands of the federal government. For this and other reasons, literalism is losing favour in Australia and several other interpretive strategies are being advanced. The article concludes by summarising the challengers to literalism, analyzing their merits and weaknesses, and suggesting a synthesis.

Downloads

Published

1992-02-01