The Valentine's Card in the Operating Room: Codes of Ethics and the Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession
AbstractThis article discusses the growing disillusionment with the legal profession shared by both lawyers and non-lawyers. This trend is coincident with an evolution of codes of conduct, from those reflecting ethical aspirations to those that spell out legally enforceable minimum standards. The author summarizes some of the contributing factors of this disillusionment. They are the increasing commercialism of practice, the fragmentation of the profession, rampant specialization and the excesses specialisations of the adversary system. The author attempts to answer the question, "Can modern codes of conduct effectively serve both ideological and regulatory functions?" by analyzing the reasons for disillusionment with the profession, the evolution of such codes and by making proposals for the future.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.